Cal High Court Lets Stand Starbucks Award Reversal
By wchung | 03 Jul, 2026
The California Supreme Court will not review a appeals court ruling that wiped out an $86 million judgment against coffee giant Starbucks over tip sharing at its stores in the state.
The court did not explain why it refused to take up the case at its weekly conference Wednesday.
In 2008, a San Diego County Superior Court judge ordered Starbucks Corp. to pay millions in restitution to baristas who had to share their tips with supervisors.
In June, the 4th District Court of Appeal reversed that ruling, saying that supervisors perform the same job as baristas and should get their share of collective tip jars.
Former barista Jou Chau filed the class-action lawsuit in 2004 on behalf of more than 100,000 current and former baristas in California. Laura Ho of Goldstein, Demchak, Baller, Borgen & Dardarian of Oakland, CA. tried the case on behalf of Chau and the other Starbucks baristas certified as the plaintiff class. The initial award of $105 million had been reduced to $86 mil. prior to the first appeal.
9/10/2009 1:25 AM SAN DIEGO (AP)
Recent Articles
- Zuckerberg Says Meta AI Agent Tech Progressing Slower Than Expected
- Japan's Services Activity Returned to Growth in June
- Air Force to Investigate Officer Who Called for Trump Impeachment
- How Americans Plan to Celebrate July 4th 250
- Tesla's China-Made EV Sales Jumped 24.4% on Year in June
- OpenAI Proposes AI Firms Hand 5% Stakes to US Government
- Microsoft Launches Firm to Help Companies Adopt AI with $2.5 Billion
- Rivian Raises 2026 Delivery Forecast on Strong Demand, R2 Boost
- US Job Growth Slowed in June but Unemployment Rate Fell to 4.2% As Labor Force Shrinks
- Tesla Posts Record Q2 Deliveries on Europe Sales Rebound
